[ad_1]
Legacy Sequels have sucked for some time and its time for Hollywood to maneuver on from bringing again outdated characters for no motive.
What precisely is a legacy sequel? In response to the web, it’s “a piece that follows the continuity of the unique work(s), however takes place additional alongside the timeline, typically specializing in new characters with the unique ones nonetheless current within the plot.” And boy have they gotten widespread. From The Exorcist: Believer to Halloween 2018 to even Netflix’s Texas Chainsaw Bloodbath, they’ve been churning out steadily. Hell, we acquired a freaking Mutilator 2 out of it (and who would have ever anticipated that?). And it’s arduous to not marvel why we’re getting so many.
Originality generally is a arduous factor for financiers to gamble on. This is the reason we discover ourselves amid pattern after pattern that takes over film theaters till most people is sick of it. As quickly as one thing hits, they go after it like rabid canine until there’s nothing extra to choose from the corpse. And the cycle repeats. Superhero motion pictures had been the most recent casualty. In 2015, we noticed Star Wars return with A Power Awakens, however I’m a horror man, so I’ll use an instance from the horror world: 2018’s Halloween. This noticed the return of Jamie Lee Curtis to the function that made her well-known in Laurie Strode. They ignored all the sequels outdoors of the unique and set to inform a narrative throughout three movies. Besides, that’s probably not what occurred, they usually betrayed the whole idea of a legacy sequel.
Whereas Halloween 2018 was introduced as the primary of a brand new trilogy, there wasn’t a lot of a plan after this entry. David Gordon Inexperienced and Firm actually simply did issues on the fly. Which is why when Halloween Ends got here lengthy, the purpose of it being a legacy sequel appeared misplaced upon the filmmakers. The characters we all know from prior motion pictures don’t even act like themselves, character arcs are recycled or ignored and we find yourself spending extra time with a very new individual. So what was even the purpose? It may have simply been a daily sequel with none of the characters from 2018 or Kills and DGG may have achieved his dumb Corey Cunningham story.
Then there was The Exorcist: Believer. I’ve come to this film’s protection a number of occasions and nonetheless don’t suppose it’s the dangerous film that some declare it to be. However the stuff that IS dangerous is every little thing associated to the unique Exorcist AKA all the Legacy Sequel features. Eliminate these components, and it will be a singular possession story. After Believer one factor grew to become clear: Legacy Sequels have gotten to go. As a result of the extra they’ve caught across the extra filmmakers appear to fully lose the purpose of them. We need to see these characters return and honor what got here earlier than it, not fully flip the characters on their heads. There’s nothing extra insulting than having a personality we’ve recognized for many years, return in a Legacy Sequel, solely to die to service newer characters we care much less about.
And that’s to not say there aren’t some nice Legacy Sequels. Heck, in some ways, Wes Craven’s New Nightmare could possibly be thought-about a Legacy sequel, so the fashion of movie has been round for fairly a while. However the laziness that has change into synonymous with them is getting too obvious. It appears many filmmakers simply suppose that bringing again previous characters is sufficient, whereas paying no thoughts of maintaining them constant or placing them into an attention-grabbing story. It’s merely “Hey, this individual is returning so followers must be comfortable.”
I used to be fed up with Legacy Sequels as soon as Halloween Ends got here alongside and was fully irrelevant to the remainder of the sequence. After organising a number of motion pictures of “Laurie goes to go after Michael” we as a substitute acquired “Michael sleeps in a sewer and offers his mystical powers to a clumsy automotive mechanic.” Simply make sequels and get away from the Legacy facet. We don’t have to see these individuals return to roles 30+ years later when these new roles basically tarnish the prior legacy. Which makes the purpose of those sequels fully moot. Right here’s hoping they lastly simply deal with making good motion pictures as a substitute of who they’ll carry again. However the cynic in me is tough to persuade.
What do YOU take into consideration Legacy Sequels? Do you suppose we should always transfer on from them? Or do you suppose we should always give them one other likelihood? Remark under and tell us!
Associated
Friday The thirteenth: Corey Feldman needs a Tommy Vs. Jason film
[ad_2]
Source link
