[ad_1]
Following the announcement, President Volodymyr Zelenskyy tweeted that he had come to the summit in Vilnius, Lithuania, hoping NATO could be a corporation that “doesn’t hesitate, doesn’t waste time and doesn’t look again at any aggressor … is that an excessive amount of to anticipate?”
On Wednesday, the Ukrainian chief walked again his criticism, saying: “I feel by the tip of summit, we’ve got nice unity from our leaders and the safety ensures — that could be a success for this summit, I feel so.”
On Sunday, Sullivan acknowledged that whereas the the alliance totally helps Ukraine, there are situations the nation might want to meet earlier than it could formally grow to be a NATO member, together with an finish to its warfare with Russia.
Admitting Ukraine whereas the warfare is ongoing would require NATO to affix in its protection, Sullivan mentioned.
“Having Ukraine come into NATO whereas the warfare is happening would imply that NATO was at warfare with Russia, it might imply the US was at warfare with Russia. And neither NATO nor the US had been ready to do this,” Sullivan mentioned on ABC’s “This Week.”
Sullivan additionally famous that each nation who enters into the alliance has to make sure democratic reforms.
“Ukraine has made a number of progress on that pathway. It has extra reforms to make,” he mentioned.
“And on the finish of the day, President Biden and President Zelenskyy stood collectively earlier than the world, and President Zelenskyy mentioned that whereas he didn’t get every thing he wished, he was very glad with the outcomes of the NATO summit and really glad with the help that he’s getting from his Western companions,” Sullivan added.
[ad_2]
Source link
