[ad_1]
Each week I learn a couple of excellent articles however I’ve little or nothing so as to add. So I don’t put up on them. However sometimes–and that is the primary time–I’ll hyperlink to some of the articles, quote a couple of segments, and perhaps add my few ideas.
Listed below are two wonderful articles that I learn this week.
Jesse Walker, “The Battlefields of Cable,” Cause, August 15, 2023.
Excerpt:
When C-SPAN’s cameras got here to Congress in 1979, a wave of cold guerrilla maneuvers adopted. Newt Gingrich, in these days a brash younger Georgia congressman, led an rebel cell of Republicans on the lookout for methods to make the cameras work for them. Considered one of their strategies was to ship so-called “particular order” speeches when the day’s enterprise was over, which along with airing stay on cable may very well be shared with native channels again dwelling.
“These speeches ceaselessly referred to as out the Democratic opposition instantly, daring them to reply,” the Purdue historian Kathryn Cramer Brownell writes in 24/7 Politics, a brand new historical past of cable information and the regulatory forces that formed it. “However no person did,” she provides, “as a result of the legislative session had ended and everybody was gone.” Not that you would inform that by watching the present, for the reason that digicam’s eye stayed mounted on the individual talking.
And:
C-SPAN was the brainchild of Brian Lamb, who had labored for Whitehead on the Workplace of Telecommunications Coverage, and it was sponsored by the cable trade, which hoped the channel would show the medium’s worth. Between its noncommercial ethos, its dedication to shining a lightweight on the federal government’s interior workings, and its Warholian willingness to let a immobile digicam run whereas nothing gave the impression to be taking place, C-SPAN was one of many few nationwide cable channels of the Nineteen Eighties that resembled these previous hippie goals of what TV may very well be. Nevertheless it was additionally a creature of the milieu it coated, a spot the place Bob Walkers and Tip O’Neills may jockey for place. If this was guerrilla tv, it wasn’t the type the New Left had imagined a decade earlier than. It was a panorama for folk like Gingrich to conduct guerrilla warfare.
I’ve lengthy been a fan of Brian Lamb. He was one among C-SPAN’s finest interviewers of authors. His questions weren’t “gotcha” questions however, as a substitute, “information-seeking” questions. However alongside the best way, he sometimes acquired unimaginable admissions from authors who, due to his format, relaxed.
David J. Bier, “The Authorities Cheats, Loses, and Cheats Once more to Make Immigrating Unlawful,” Cato at Liberty, August 16, 2023.
Excerpt:
You traveled a thousand miles and spent hundreds of {dollars} to achieve the USA. The immigration rulebook (generally referred to as “the regulation”) says that when you made it, you would apply for asylum and that officers “shall” course of you. However guess what? On this sport, the federal government cheats. It doesn’t need to course of you. It needs you to go dwelling. So if you reached the border in 2019, the officers on the authorized crossing level wouldn’t course of you. They stood in the course of the bridge to dam you.
You joined a lawsuit, and a court docket mentioned, “Authorities, what you’re doing is prohibited. Cease.” So in November 2021, the federal government issued a new coverage that claims, “You border guys, you may’t inform folks to go away.” Nevertheless it then promptly ignored that coverage “due to COVID-19.” However that excuse led to Might 2023, so it reiterated the coverage in a formal rulemaking. It couldn’t be clearer: “Our coverage is to examine and course of all arriving noncitizens.” So that you’d assume you’ll get processed when you arrived on the border. However no, the federal government cheats.
Border officers are telling those who they need to make appointments earlier than they will request asylum, and so they cap the variety of appointments, though the brand new guidelines make it completely clear an appointment won’t be required. You possibly can’t even schedule an appointment in any respect. Quite, you’re put in a lottery to determine when you may even request an appointment. When Isabel “Doe” confirmed up unannounced at a authorized crossing level along with her bleeding husband whom a cartel shot, she was turned away. Her husband was then murdered in Mexico.
Quite a lot of my mates inform me that they don’t seem to be in opposition to immigration however, slightly, in opposition to unlawful immigration. Right here’s the take a look at of their sincerity: Do they favor having the federal government obey its personal regulation? If not, they don’t seem to be in favor of authorized immigration and are, in reality, in favor of presidency illegality.
(0 COMMENTS)
[ad_2]
Source link
