[ad_1]
The unique submit was actually a “no true Scotsman” fallacy. The consumer implying that Bitcoin is worthy of assist as a result of nobody who actually understands Bitcoin wouldn’t assist it. That is in fact false, as many central bankers perceive Bitcoin however don’t assist it because it takes away their skill to regulate fiscal coverage.
Nevertheless!
The second poster is using the “fallacy fallacy”, implying that Bitcoin should not be worthy of assist as a result of the unique poster is utilizing a logical fallacy.
Let’s hold it going! Which logical fallacy have i employed?
submitted by /u/theonepercent65536 [comments]
[ad_2]
Source link
